| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UK and Ireland Discussion on racing from the UK and Ireland. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #21 (permalink) | |||
| Sir Realist Join Date: Jul 2004 Age: 27
Posts: 7,796
| 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating' is the original and more meaningful version of the cliche... Quote:
Quote:
what if the system says you should lay the 2nd fav 6/1 shot when there is a 2/1 fav, then the 6/1 shot starts shortening and at the off is 4/1 while the fav has lenthenged to 3/1? By the rules of the sytem you'd still be laying a late on steamer against a drifter fav? Didn't the steamer steam for a reason? Quote:
The thread title 'Investor Form Lays' is the first clue that this is an attempt (albeit futile - you're on the wrong forum) to ultimately try to entice people to part with money. The line early on in the first post "a progressive horse backing system" is the final nail in the coffin of credibility. Fordy, for all I know you really can spot value lays in horse races. But if you can then why surround it with so much bollocks? | |||
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Bronze Member Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11
| No m8, but it highlights why I have such a rule. I'll try and get them posted before 11 if i can, but I only suggest paper trading until we get some confidence amongst you sceptics! BTW - The Lay 1-4 Staking Plan would of recovered your earlier losses and made you a profit for today. |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Bronze Member Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11
| Quote:
Obviously testing a system and wanting feedback is a 'no' go on this forum which is a shame but nothing lost hey? I'll spend my nights critising others in the hope my life might one day, get as interesting as yours!! | |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | ||
| Sir Realist Join Date: Jul 2004 Age: 27
Posts: 7,796
| Quote:
I don't know much about horse racing but I can see right through poorly conceived ideas about betting 'systems' regardless of what sport they are based on. Quote:
You don't need to post on a forum to test a system. There's only two reasons you would: 1. you crave adulation, 2. you are trying to entice people into ultimately paying for the system. As for wanting feedback, you've got some. I guess it just doesn't fit in to either of the above categories. | ||
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Gold Member | Out of interest PS, do you remember what the bet was??
__________________ Winner of the 2006 and 2007 UBF golf competitions (Managed by 36, run by Wickerman and sponsored by Gary) A monkey in a dinner suit is still a monkey. |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Sir Realist Join Date: Jul 2004 Age: 27
Posts: 7,796
| Stone Cold to win the 2001 Royal Rumble at 4/1 at Hills. Actually - no I never did put that on and have regretted it ever since. First bet was probably some mug football acca. First golf bet I would actually have been 22 and it was for a stake of around 20p e/w on I think Brett Quigley in the 2003 Greater Milwaukee Open. Came in the places and I remember having a lengthy email back and forth with victor chandler about how I thought they'd incorrrectly settled it and short changed me to the tune of 14p or something. No doubt they thought I was taking the piss but I genuinely wasn't! |
| | |