Go Back   The Ultimate Betting Forum > Sports > Cricket
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th September 2008, 21:23   #21 (permalink)
linesharp
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 13
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

you didn't seem 'in' with the revolution to me......if I am mistaken then I apologise and respectfully ask what you plan to do to avoid losing thousands and thousands each year?
linesharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2008, 21:29   #22 (permalink)
bowler
Dismembered Member
 
bowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,718
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

chill linesharp - this is normally a more refined version of a forum, people tend to have less agendas here and have a reasoned debate
__________________
What a surprise
They march off to war
Nothing to give
And nothing to score
It seems so dear
The final demand
Waterloo teeth from the ghost of a man
bowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2008, 21:30   #23 (permalink)
linesharp
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 13
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

hands up I'm still a little over excited! forgive me I'm sorry xxxxxxxx
linesharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2008, 21:35   #24 (permalink)
Rosebud
Gold Member
 
Rosebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,943
Blog Entries: 2
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Quote:
Originally Posted by linesharp View Post
you didn't seem 'in' with the revolution to me......if I am mistaken then I apologise and respectfully ask what you plan to do to avoid losing thousands and thousands each year?
I don't think it's a case of being 'in' or 'out' with a 'revolution' personally. Everyone should try to take a step away, reflect on their own personal circumstances, digest the implications in real terms and listen to the Q&A tomorrow night. No offence taken here linesharp, welcome on board.
Rosebud is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2008, 21:48   #25 (permalink)
linesharp
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 13
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

your right Rose much appreciated
linesharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 04:00   #26 (permalink)
Pierre LP
Racing Driver
 
Pierre LP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Green Parrot, Trinidad
Posts: 1,617
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Betfair haven't even informed me of the change yet. I expect that the Q&A session could be quite comical judging by some of the alleged responses from BF that I have seen posted.
__________________
Ad perpetuatatum in luto, altitudo solum varia est
Pierre LP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 09:15   #27 (permalink)
TeddyBoy
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Teddington
Posts: 46
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Ok, back the cricket...

This looks like one of the more straight forward ones to take a look into. The 'surely Lancashire will win every game they play' odds bus seems to have broken down but there is no way the are 6/4 shots, that's way too short.

Lancs have had over 3 times less time out in the middle in this competition than Notts, which considering they've each 'played' 6 games must be a big factor. In fact Lancs have only had the equivalent of 1.5 games in total. Those that were completed were both lost (one a hammering to Worcs).
Notts have completed every game played, their two losses were both tight (6 runs on D/L after a spectacular collapse and one with a ball to spare). Add in the disquiet hovering around Lancs at the moment, and I can only see one result, and would have have Notts nearer 1.5 myself.

No weather to piss on the Betdaq parade today hopefully Get the duck bus started... see you later this afternoon
TeddyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 09:19   #28 (permalink)
TeddyBoy
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Teddington
Posts: 46
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Also should add current reported matched volumes at 8:20 are

Betunfair: £1,417
BetDaq: £16,145

Piss poor liquidity at the unfair place too, got to laugh
TeddyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 10:56   #29 (permalink)
bigmitch
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Hi All - just as an aside to the commission debate, I'll admit that in my time at Betfair I am a net loser but I am getting better as time goes on. I believe I'll be a winner in the future. Therefore Betfair's behaviour with regard to the commission is still a kick in the balls for someone like me despite the fact I am unaffected. I've opened a Betdaq account too (you'll soon be taking my cash I'm sure!), well done to all and hopefully there are more like you (and me) who will do the same.

Good luck today.
bigmitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 12:38   #30 (permalink)
Delta1223
Bronze Member
 
Delta1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

WD Bigmitch.
Most sensible post so far.
No doubt everyone wants to be in 0.5%

Actually even among 0.5% only 2% are going to be suffered according to betfair.

I'm not in favour of this decision but still IMO too much reaction from members.
Delta1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 12:51   #31 (permalink)
Mister Logic
Old Member
 
Mister Logic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pompey
Posts: 6,423
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta1223 View Post
Actually even among 0.5% only 2% are going to be suffered according to betfair..
Rubbish.

They have said it is 2% of the winners on BF which equates to 0.5% overall.
Mister Logic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 13:22   #32 (permalink)
TwoTonTed
Gold Member
 
TwoTonTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Teddington (posh end)
Posts: 82
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

yep, as yesterday, Quack market is being traded by the escapees prior to Lumpy arrive on the Robbers
TwoTonTed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 13:22   #33 (permalink)
Delta1223
Bronze Member
 
Delta1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
Cool Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Let me explain it :

2% of winners = 0.5% of total.
...............
Suppose betfair total members = 1000

5 comes in this category which is 2% of winners.

Total winners = 5x50

=250
..................
Means 250/1000 are winners at betfair.

25% members are winners.

Is this possible ?
Delta1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 13:55   #34 (permalink)
Maradona
Gold Member
 
Maradona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 681
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Not only not possible (imo) but not what BF are claiming. This is quoted direct from service announcement:

"If we’d had this charge in place over the last year less than 2% of those customers who were in profit (after commission) would have paid it. More than 98% of Betfair’s winning customers would never have been charged".
(my highlight)

Nothing therein relates to total/winning accounts ratio; just that premium charge would affect less than 2% of those accounts which are winners (according to BF). Whether one believes this is another question.
__________________
ambiguas in vulgum spargere voces
Maradona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 14:06   #35 (permalink)
Delta1223
Bronze Member
 
Delta1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Sorry if any of my post seems to be advocating betfair.
I don't have any intention to defend betfair.
I only want to say that analyze situation first.
Delta1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 14:18   #36 (permalink)
Di-Bol
Bronze Member
 
Di-Bol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

I have just received my betfair p&l premium charge breakdown (by the way if anyone wants to see one pm me & u can have a copy)

According to it, had the premium tax been in I would be out of pocket by £567.76, this is based on p&l over last 60 wks of £14500 roughly (including a disaster I had last week where I managed to lose £2700 chasing a loss)

I cannot be in the top 0.5% with this p&l, which is why I dont get that they are sticking to their points that it only affects a very small % and a targeted few. I dont use betangle or bettrader, and wouldnt know where to start with a bot.
I think I kind of understand what they where trying to achieve with the changes, going after a certain small section of people, but their implementation of it seems to have included a hell of alot of 'normal' punters, and obv they way they delivered it was a mess.
Di-Bol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 14:26   #37 (permalink)
Maradona
Gold Member
 
Maradona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 681
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

..just on the topic of total number of winning accounts, the 0.5% figure is something of a red herring (again, imo). What BF actually say (in "About Us/Premium Charges") is

"In addition to the other charges detailed above, a small number (less than 0.5%) of our most successful customers will incur Premium Charges.

Given the highlighted caveats, this means nothing whatsoever.

Delta1223 - I certainly didn't imagine you were defending BF!
__________________
ambiguas in vulgum spargere voces
Maradona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 14:47   #38 (permalink)
pokerdave
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 3
Send a message via MSN to pokerdave
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Has anyone got any actual thoughts on the cricket?

Notts should have too much for Lanky here i feel. Teams as below:

Notts Outlaws team to face Lancashire: Will Jefferson, Graeme Swann, Mark Wagh, Ashwell Prince, Samit Patel, Bilal Shafayat, Chris Read (Capt / Wkt), Mark Ealham, Andre Adams, Darren Pattinson, Charlie Shreck

Lancashire Lightning 13-man squad
Lou Vincent
Karl Brown
Paul Horton
Stuart Law (cpt)
Francois Du Plessis
Steven Croft
Gareth Cross (wkt)
Glen Chapple
Tom Smith
Oliver Newby
Gary Keedy
Kyle Hogg
Stephen Parry
pokerdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 15:00   #39 (permalink)
Rosebud
Gold Member
 
Rosebud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,943
Blog Entries: 2
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Lancs are all over the place at the moment, on and off the pitch. Notts should have too much, need to win next two games at home to win it so motivation not a problem. Lancs, on the other hand, don't seem to be arsed. Cue an emphatic Lancs victory.
Rosebud is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2008, 15:10   #40 (permalink)
BigMig
Gold Member
 
BigMig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 70
Default Re: Nottingham v Lanky - This time it wont rain on Betdaqs parade

Ashwell Prince? That one passed me by.

Notts look far too strong but wait for in-running, I think
BigMig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:27.



LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0